
Stephanie Mavromatis | Senior Legal Consultant
Stephanie Mavromatis is a Senior Legal Consultant who has over six years’ experience in criminal defence as well as other areas of law.
Stephanie deals with all stages of criminal proceedings, from police station up to Crown Court, and has expertise in a wide range of criminal offences from low level offences such as theft, assault and public order offences to more serious offences including complex drug, serious violence, sexual offences, complex fraud and murder.
Stephanie believes that regardless of the seriousness of the offence, each case should be prepared with utmost efficiency and tenacity in order to achieve the best outcome for the client.
Stephanie works very closely with young and vulnerable people and has been praised for her empathetic nature and resilience in preparing their cases to the highest standard, ensuring clients understand their case and are empowered to effectively participate in their defence. She thrives on the legal and strategic challenges involved in preparing cases for trial and fights on behalf of her clients to avoid prosecution wherever possible, whether by challenging the evidential basis of an investigation through representations and requests for disclosure or challenging the decision that it is in the public interest to prosecute.
Notable Cases:
- R v OA (2024) – Snaresbrook Crown Court – Cultivation of Cannabis, possession of a firearm and concerned in the supply of class B.
Result: After multiple requests for disclosure and finding holes in the Prosecution’s case, the Crown conceded and offered no evidence and formally dropped the case against the client.
- R v LF (2024) – Wood Green Crown Court – Rape x2 and Stalking Causing Fear or Violence
Result: Prosecution offered no evidence and dropped the case after persistent requests for disclosure that could not be met.
- R v RA (2023) – Isleworth Crown Court – Possession of an Offensive Weapon and Threats to Cause Fear or Violence
Result: After challenging the complainant in cross examination and advancing the defence of reasonable excuse, the Defendant was found Not Guilty after trial and was acquitted.
- R v TL (2024) – Southwark Crown Court – Theft x 36 and Breach of Criminal Behaviour Order x8
Result: The defendant had sustained significant brain trauma which led to complex cognitive dysfunctions that resulted in him mass offending. After successful complex legal arguments and working closely with various organisations, the client avoided a custodial sentence and was placed in suitable housing for vulnerable individuals where he could receive appropriate care needed.
- R v MM (2023) – Isleworth Crown Court – Kidnap and assault
Result: Secured a Not Guilty verdict after trial after vigorously challenging the Prosecution’s case.
- R v KB (2023) – Woolwich Crown Court – Conspiracy to supply Class A drugs
Result: Despite dealing in a large quantity of drugs, the Defendant received a Suspended Sentence after putting forward a persuasive sentencing bundle.
- R v RT (2023) – Croydon Crown Court – Possession with intent to supply Class A X5
Result: After advancing a successful defence of Modern-Day Slavery, the Defendant was found Not Guilty after trial.
- R v DB (2023) – Central Criminal Court – Attempted Murder and Section 18 GBH & ABH
Result: Secured a Not Guilty verdict after a lengthy trial where the case was meticulously prepared, and Prosecution’s evidence and witnesses were extensively challenged.
- R v AB (2022) – Central Criminal Court – Murder
Result: Successfully secured a not guilty verdict to murder on the grounds of Diminished Responsibility.
- R v DH (2022) – Isleworth Crown Court – Possession with Intent to Supply Class A drugs x2 and possession of criminal property
Result: Defendant received a Suspended Sentence after strong mitigation was put forward.
- R v BD (2020) – Inner London Crown Court – Fraud by False Representation over 1 million.
Result: Defendant received a Suspended Sentence after putting forward extensive mitigation.